From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA1C688B for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:03:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2013 08:04:43 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,535,1378882800"; d="scan'208";a="430162967" Received: from cccressen-mobl4.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO debian) ([10.237.220.107]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2013 08:04:37 -0800 Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:04:37 +0000 From: Cyril Cressent To: Jyotiswarup Raiturkar Message-ID: <20131105160437.GK26200@debian> Mail-Followup-To: Jyotiswarup Raiturkar , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <20131105122319.GA26200@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Shannon, Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Ireland User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] pci_unbind.py failure X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:03:55 -0000 On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:01:06PM +0530, Jyotiswarup Raiturkar wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply. I saw some definitions of e1000_phy_82579 hence > I thought (hoped) the NIC would be supported. I will try to run my dpdk app > inside a VM with an emulated e1000 NIC (just to test the code ..). As a general rule, even if you find references to a NIC in the poll mode drivers, if it's not listed in lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_dev_ids.h then consider the NIC as not supported. Good luck with the VM, Cyril