From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com
 [74.125.82.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6133C5906
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:03:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x55so1384631wes.12
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:04:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc
 :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
 bh=5etQQcXnTYurQ0ox4hSV7bUzfEIGqvr7wrO2VPLYHj0=;
 b=ZCsarhitxMJtQYnhf8//GwdG4jm+TF6434PSJsQHAeIu7LRJ7pGh2QOMJp+pEuXYQb
 Ne7hxMIAArab3QEfoE9JT3K9aC1f11PVhl2Dv2vaZJc/1Q6PSFPePq8VPtywwSZBZntQ
 kvslNWphIwpf/qLV3MMJmiN0QAoijB8gI/QsdIJT7StV0nJD5Dy5Fqkff6tktd+9aQQP
 TZXePdrPEp3sslQpXhs9lQUrftf3ICa78KYbzN4OhIGQ4DiRuweKpYlKU6GJxfsFaBOS
 CKjDvyyGMwKr7E21n3TmoYN7VHdQDLI7dd4nPkx9ZF7qW1z6ZmL8o+Oh90DAMFVsDU63
 eoXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkoAf6ocI/hc+x1lKR+aEGcXlpXWIzm0aBc14SuxCi8awCapCzpiD7PZaXOKv8pxajQvJ/1
X-Received: by 10.180.86.9 with SMTP id l9mr3355531wiz.20.1387472674187;
 Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from angus.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o9sm12868690wib.10.2013.12.19.09.04.32
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:04:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Organization: 6WIND
To: ankit kumar <akprajapati616@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:04:31 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAG9qd2pi-Q7LawBymDSsAY3054FUqf7RK0L61oDrsKVY_Q4S0Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG9qd2pi-Q7LawBymDSsAY3054FUqf7RK0L61oDrsKVY_Q4S0Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <201312191804.31322.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Is rte_mempool library is multi-thread safe ???
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:03:27 -0000

Hello,

19/12/2013 11:57, ankit kumar :
> It was working fine but i am not sure that memory allocation &
> deallocation in rte_mempool library, is multi-thread safe or not.

=46rom http://dpdk.org/doc/api/rte__mempool_8h.html:
	"the mempool implementation is not preemptable"
There is more explanations in this email:
	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2013-August/000402.html

=2D-=20
Thomas