DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mem: add write memory barrier before changing heap state
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:44:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140415144440.GD3557@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397569859-14460-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com>

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:50:58PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> From: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>
> 
> a write memory barrier is needed before changing heap state
> value, else some concurrent core may see state changing before
> all initialization values are written to memory, causing
> unpredictable results in malloc function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_malloc/malloc_heap.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_malloc/malloc_heap.c b/lib/librte_malloc/malloc_heap.c
> index f4a0294..64668cb 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_malloc/malloc_heap.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_malloc/malloc_heap.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ malloc_heap_init(struct malloc_heap *heap)
>  			 */
>  			heap->numa_socket = heap - mcfg->malloc_heaps;
>  			rte_spinlock_init(&heap->lock);
> +			rte_wmb();
>  			heap->initialised = INITIALISED;
>  		}
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> 
This certainly won't hurt anything, but from my read we have a fixed array of
malloc_heaps in the mem_config array.  It would seem to me that the more
appropriate solution would be to initalize all of the malloc_heaps before
starting any additional threads or processes that access the dpdk.  I.e. call
malloc_heap_init for every entry in the array during rte_eal_init.  That
prevents you from even needing to keep the ->initalized member around because
its ready during the library initalization

Neil
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-15 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-15 13:50 David Marchand
2014-04-15 13:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] mem: fix initialization check for malloc heap David Marchand
2014-04-15 14:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mem: add write memory barrier before changing heap state Richardson, Bruce
2014-04-16  8:55   ` didier.pallard
2014-04-15 14:44 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2014-04-18 12:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] rework heap initialisation David Marchand
2014-04-18 12:56     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] malloc: get rid of numa_socket field David Marchand
2014-04-18 13:08       ` Neil Horman
2014-04-30  9:46         ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-04-18 12:56     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] malloc: simplify heap initialisation David Marchand
2014-04-18 13:09       ` Neil Horman
2014-04-30  9:47         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140415144440.GD3557@hmsreliant.think-freely.org \
    --to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).