DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Heads up: Fedora packaging plans
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 15:08:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140513190840.GB31172@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> (raw)

Hey all-
	This isn't really germaine to dpdk development, but Thomas and Vincent,
you expressed interest in my progress regarding packaging of dpdk for Fedora, so
I figured I would post here in case others were interested.

Please find here:
http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/dpdk-1.7.0-0.1.gitb20539d68.src.rpm

My current effort to do so.  I've made some changes from the stock spec file
included in dpdk:

* Modified the version and release values to be separate from the name.  I did
some reading on requirements for packaging and it seems we can be a bit more lax
with ABI version on a pre-release I think, so I setup the N-V-R to use
pre-release conventions, which makes sense, give that this is a 1.7.0
pre-release.  The git tag on the relase value will get bumped as we move forward
in the patch series.

* Added config files to match desired configs for Fedora (i.e. disabled PMD's
that require out of tree kernel modules

* Removed Packager tag (Fedora doesn't use those)

* Moved the package target directories to include N-V of the package in the path
names.  This allows for multiple versions of the dpdk to be installed in
parallel (I.e. dpdk-1.7.0 files are in /lib/dpdk-1.7.0, /usr/include/dpdk-1.7.0,
etc).  This is how java packages allow for multiple version installs, and makes
sense given ABI instability in dpdk.  It will require that developers add some
-I / -L paths to their makefiles to pull the proper version, but I think thats a
fair tradeoff.

My plan is to go through the review process with this package, and update to
tagged 1.7.0 as soon as its ready.  

Neil
 

             reply	other threads:[~2014-05-13 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-13 19:08 Neil Horman [this message]
2014-05-13 22:46 ` Vincent JARDIN
2014-05-14 10:54   ` Neil Horman
2014-05-19 10:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-19 13:18   ` Neil Horman
2014-05-19 16:28     ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-19 16:48       ` Neil Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140513190840.GB31172@hmsreliant.think-freely.org \
    --to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).