From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E65A231C for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 13:07:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hmsreliant.think-freely.org ([2001:470:8:a08:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1WpyB6-0002DA-33; Thu, 29 May 2014 07:07:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 07:07:18 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20140529110718.GA25784@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <1401195316-31149-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <20140528141751.GA2648@localhost.localdomain> <2509781.kUZheoFqzk@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2509781.kUZheoFqzk@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Status: No Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: fix link with gcc X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:07:12 -0000 On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:24:56AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Neil, > > 2014-05-28 10:17, Neil Horman: > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 02:55:16PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Some linker options were not prefixed by -Wl, when using gcc: > > > -z muldefs > > > -melf_i386 (32-bit config) > > > > > > Using macro linkerprefix is fixing it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > [...] > > > ifeq ($(LINK_USING_CC),1) > > > # Override the definition of LD here, since we're linking with CC > > > LD := $(CC) > > > > > > +LD_MULDEFS := $(call linkerprefix,-z$(comma)muldefs) > > > +CPU_LDFLAGS := $(call linkerprefix,$(CPU_LDFLAGS)) > > > > Agree with Olivier, what exactly is the problem here? > > When using CC as LD, linker options should be prefixed with -Wl. > > > Also, I don't think > > this is correct, as CPU_LD_FLAGS and -z muldefs below is used in > > conjunction with $LD. It would make sense to prefix -Wl to these options > > if we were passing them through $CC, but not $LD > > Yes, but options are prefixed only in the case LD = CC. > ah, sorry, was looking at the wrong clause in rte.lib.mk > Neil, this situation is funny as you're the author of the patch making LD as > CC and you submitted this kind of fix to prefix CPU_LDFLAGS :) > This patch is a translation of yours with use of macro linkerprefix. > Yeah, my fault, I was only looking at the lines changed, rather than the context surrounding them. This makes sense. Neil > -- > Thomas >