From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D2F594D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:55:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 078A980C764; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:56:14 -0700
From: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
To: "Kavanagh, Mark B" <mark.b.kavanagh@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20140723215614.GA19555@mhcomputing.net>
References: <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846BA3C50@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <53CFE4C6.7080506@fixup.fi>
 <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846BA3CFA@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846BA3CFA@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Performance - linking against DPDK shared vs static
 libraries
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:55:25 -0000

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:43:49PM +0000, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> I take it ... that the performance drop when using shared libraries is 
> expected behavior?

s/expected behavior/and unavoidable consequence/g

;)

Matthew Hall.