From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <mhall@mhcomputing.net> Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D2F594D for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:55:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 078A980C764; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:56:14 -0700 From: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net> To: "Kavanagh, Mark B" <mark.b.kavanagh@intel.com> Message-ID: <20140723215614.GA19555@mhcomputing.net> References: <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846BA3C50@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> <53CFE4C6.7080506@fixup.fi> <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846BA3CFA@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846BA3CFA@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Performance - linking against DPDK shared vs static libraries X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:55:25 -0000 On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:43:49PM +0000, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote: > I take it ... that the performance drop when using shared libraries is > expected behavior? s/expected behavior/and unavoidable consequence/g ;) Matthew Hall.