DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Venky Venkatesan <venky.venkatesan@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] dpdk: Allow for dynamic enablement of some isolated features
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:17:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140730191714.GA3296@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D9418A.5020308@intel.com>

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:03:38PM -0700, Venky Venkatesan wrote:
> Neil,
> 
> >Hey all-
> >         I've been trying to update the fedora dpdk package to support VFIO
> >enabled drivers and ran into a problem in which ixgbe didn't compile because the
> >rxtx_vec code uses sse4.2 instruction intrinsics, which aren't supported in the
> >default config I have.  I tried to remedy this by replacing the intrinsics with
> >the __builtin macros, but it was pointed out (correctly), that this doesn't work
> >properly.  So this is my second attempt, which I actually like a bit better.  I
> >noted that code that uses intrinsics (ixgbe and the acl library), don't need to
> >have those instructions turned on build-wide.  Rather, we can just enable the
> >instructions in the specific code we want to build with support for that, and
> >test for instruction support dynamically at run time.  This allows me to build
> >the dpdk for a generic platform, but in such a way that some optimizations can
> >be used if the executing cpu supports them at run time.
> >
> >Change notes:
> >
> >v2)
> >	* Added Log messages to run time check failures per Konstantin
> >	* Removed run time check caching in acl per Konstantin
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> >CC: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
> >
> 
> One possible change to look at - the _mm_shuffle_epi8 is something that is
> available all the way from SSSE3, so you should be able to leave that in.
> The SSE4.2 dependency is only for the popcount (and __builtin_popcountll
> will work for that anyway). That should make things simpler.
> 
Hmm, I'd just as soon leave the use of the __builtin_* intrinsics alone at this
point, as I'd like to focus on the optional enablement of these features at run
time more than making them work in all cases (at least for right now), as I'd
like a distribution build to take advantage of the accelerated instructions when
they're available at run time..  But if we can reduce the intrinsic requirement
to ssse3 in some locations that would be good.  Let me experiment and I'll post
a v3
Neil

> -Venky
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-30 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-29 20:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Neil Horman
2014-07-29 20:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ixgbe: test sse4.2 support at runtime for vectorized receive operations Neil Horman
2014-07-29 20:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] acl: Preform dynamic sse4.2 support check Neil Horman
2014-07-30 12:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] dpdk: Allow for dynamic enablement of some isolated features Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-07-30 13:01   ` Neil Horman
2014-07-30 13:44     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-07-30 14:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Neil Horman
2014-07-30 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ixgbe: test sse4.2 support at runtime for vectorized receive operations Neil Horman
2014-07-30 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] acl: Preform dynamic sse4.2 support check Neil Horman
2014-07-30 15:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] dpdk: Allow for dynamic enablement of some isolated features Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-07-30 19:03   ` Venky Venkatesan
2014-07-30 19:17     ` Neil Horman [this message]
2014-07-30 19:34     ` Neil Horman
2014-07-30 18:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Bruce Richardson
2014-07-30 19:28   ` Neil Horman
2014-07-30 21:09     ` Bruce Richardson
2014-07-31  9:30       ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-07-31 11:36       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-07-31 13:13       ` Neil Horman
2014-07-31 13:26         ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-07-31 14:32           ` Neil Horman
2014-07-31 18:10             ` Neil Horman
2014-07-31 18:36               ` Bruce Richardson
2014-07-31 19:01                 ` Neil Horman
2014-07-31 20:19                   ` Bruce Richardson
2014-08-01 13:36                     ` Neil Horman
2014-08-01 13:56                       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-08-01 14:26                         ` Venkatesan, Venky
2014-08-01 14:27                         ` Neil Horman
2014-07-31 19:58                 ` John W. Linville
2014-07-31 20:20                   ` Bruce Richardson
2014-07-31 20:32                     ` John W. Linville
2014-08-01  8:46                       ` Vincent JARDIN
2014-08-01 14:06                         ` Neil Horman
2014-08-01 14:57                           ` Vincent JARDIN
2014-08-01 15:19                             ` Neil Horman
2014-07-31 20:10                 ` Neil Horman
2014-07-31 20:25                   ` Bruce Richardson
2014-08-01 15:06                     ` Neil Horman
2014-08-01 19:22                       ` Bruce Richardson
2014-08-01 20:43                         ` Neil Horman
2014-08-01 21:08                           ` Bruce Richardson
2014-08-02 12:56                             ` Neil Horman
2014-07-31 21:53               ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-07-31 21:25             ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140730191714.GA3296@hmsreliant.think-freely.org \
    --to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=venky.venkatesan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).