From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chrisw@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3076E18F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  7 Aug 2014 23:26:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])
 by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s77LSm7D005645
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK);
 Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:28:49 -0400
Received: from x220.localdomain (ovpn-113-117.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.117])
 by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with
 SMTP id s77LSlL8017771; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:28:48 -0400
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 14:28:47 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>
To: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20140807212847.GU26743@x220.localdomain>
References: <1407436263-9360-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
 <20140807201134.GA1632@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
 <CAG8AbRVUFLhzeKmA+Hx8sBNHnBr6608ebDyfEuSBu7Hx-RxWdw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAG8AbRVUFLhzeKmA+Hx8sBNHnBr6608ebDyfEuSBu7Hx-RxWdw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv2] librte_acl make it build/work for
 'default' target
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:26:18 -0000

* Vincent JARDIN (vincent.jardin@6wind.com) wrote:
> What's about using function versioning attributes too:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FunctionMultiVersioning
> 
> ?

Neat, hadn't seen that gcc feature before, but:

  "This support is available in GCC 4.8 and later. Support is only
   available in C++ for i386 targets."

I have 4.8.2, gcc errors, g++ works.  And entirely unclear re:
icc (which was a supported compiler).  Seems like it's not
really an option.

thanks,
-chris