DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] New Thread Safe Hash Library
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:21:29 -0400
Message-ID: <20140918122129.GD20389@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411036471-3822-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:34:28AM +0100, Pablo de Lara wrote:
> This is an alternative hash implementation to the existing hash library. 
> This patch set provides a thread safe hash implementation, it allows users 
> to use multiple readers/writers working on a same hash table.
> Main differences between the previous and the new implementation are:
> - Multiple readers/writers can work on the same hash table, 
>   whereas in the previous implementation writers could not work 
>   on the table at the same time readers do.
> - Previous implementation returned an index to a table after a lookup. 
>   This implementation returns 8-byte integers or pointers to external data.
> - Maximum entries to be looked up in bursts is 64, instead of 16.
> - Maximum key length has being increased to 128, instead of a maximum of 64.
> Basic implementation:
> - A sparse table containing buckets (64-byte long) with hashes,
>   most of which are empty, and indexes to the second table.
> - A compact table containing keys for final matching, 
>   plus data associated to them.
Thread safe hash tables seem to me like a configuration option rather than a new
library.  Instead of creating a whole new library (with a new API and ABI to
maintain, why not just add thread safety as a configurable option to the
existing hash library.  That saves code space in the DPDK, and reduces
application complexity (as the same api is useable for thread safe and unsafe
hash tables)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-18 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-18 10:34 Pablo de Lara
2014-09-18 10:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eal: add const in prefetch functions Pablo de Lara
2014-09-18 10:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] lib/librte_tshash: New Thread Safe Hash library for DPDK Pablo de Lara
2014-09-18 10:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app/test: Added unit tests for Thread Safe Hash library Pablo de Lara
2014-09-18 12:21 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2014-09-18 15:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] New Thread Safe Hash Library De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2014-09-18 15:45     ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-09-18 16:09     ` Neil Horman
2014-09-18 22:30 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140918122129.GD20389@hmsreliant.think-freely.org \
    --to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git