From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> To: Chao Zhu <bjzhuc@cn.ibm.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] Split atomic operations to architecture specific Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:05:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20140929110522.GF12072@BRICHA3-MOBL> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1411724018-7738-2-git-send-email-bjzhuc@cn.ibm.com> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 05:33:32AM -0400, Chao Zhu wrote: > This patch splits the atomic operations from DPDK and push them to > architecture specific arch directories, so that other processor > architecture to support DPDK can be easily adopted. > > Signed-off-by: Chao Zhu <bjzhuc@cn.ibm.com> > --- > lib/librte_eal/common/Makefile | 2 +- > .../common/include/i686/arch/rte_atomic_arch.h | 378 ++++++++++++++++++++ > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_atomic.h | 172 +-------- > .../common/include/x86_64/arch/rte_atomic_arch.h | 378 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 772 insertions(+), 158 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 lib/librte_eal/common/include/i686/arch/rte_atomic_arch.h > create mode 100644 lib/librte_eal/common/include/x86_64/arch/rte_atomic_arch.h > <...snip...> > +#define rte_compiler_barrier() rte_arch_compiler_barrier() Small question: shouldn't the compiler barrier be independent of architecture? /Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-29 10:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-09-26 9:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Patches to split architecture specific operations from DPDK Chao Zhu 2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] Split atomic operations to architecture specific Chao Zhu 2014-09-29 11:05 ` Bruce Richardson [this message] 2014-09-29 15:24 ` Neil Horman 2014-09-30 2:18 ` Chao CH Zhu 2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] Split byte order " Chao Zhu 2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] Split CPU cycle operation " Chao Zhu 2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] Split prefetch operations " Chao Zhu 2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] Split spinlock " Chao Zhu 2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] Split memcpy operation " Chao Zhu 2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] Split CPU flags operations " Chao Zhu 2014-10-03 13:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Patches to split architecture specific operations from DPDK David Marchand 2014-10-03 13:29 ` Bruce Richardson 2014-10-13 2:36 ` Chao CH Zhu 2014-10-06 21:46 ` Cyril Chemparathy 2014-10-12 9:14 ` Chao CH Zhu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20140929110522.GF12072@BRICHA3-MOBL \ --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \ --cc=bjzhuc@cn.ibm.com \ --cc=dev@dpdk.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
DPDK patches and discussions This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \ dev@dpdk.org public-inbox-index dev Example config snippet for mirrors. Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git