From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F26C11F5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:27:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 647A780CD23; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:33:41 -0700
From: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20140929213341.GA589@mhcomputing.net>
References: <1963310.3iizrFVzmj@xps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1963310.3iizrFVzmj@xps13>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rc1 / call for review
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:27:40 -0000

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:23:58PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 	- mbuf rework
> 	- logs rework
> 	- some eal cleanups

Hi Thomas,

I was curious, did we happen to know if any of these three changes affected 
the external API's much?

It would help us get some idea what to test and where to look, since mbuf, 
logs, and eal are probably the three most popular parts of DPDK for us app 
hackers to interact with regularly.

Thanks,
Matthew.