From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835996A8B for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:23:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 92D3D80CD23; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:29:41 -0700 From: Matthew Hall To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20140930052941.GA1834@mhcomputing.net> References: <1963310.3iizrFVzmj@xps13> <20140929213341.GA589@mhcomputing.net> <1600627.I6ZYUK1NqR@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1600627.I6ZYUK1NqR@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rc1 / call for review X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 05:23:40 -0000 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:52:45AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > You're right. > During integration time, app hackers should be able to check the git history > for these API changes. > When it will be officially released, there will be some notes in the > documentation to help porting applications. It works for commercial apps where we have 40 hrs / week to look. But for my open source app I guess I just have to do step 1) compile, step 2) pray that it still works. ;) Matthew.