From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] mbuf: Adjust TX flags to start at bit 32
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:33:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140930153348.GA13504@BRICHA3-MOBL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412090762-18852-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:26:02PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> This patch takes the existing TX flags defined for the mbuf and shifts
> each uniquely defined one left so that additional RX flags can be
> defined without having RX and TX flags mixed together.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
This is just an RFC patch for now, as I'm looking for input to make sure
this is done right. Couple of opens, if people have input:
* is a 32/32 split for RX/TX flags appropriate? Are we likely to have about
equal numbers of each?
* Doing a grep for the TX flag use, it seems the defines are commonly used,
but if anyone is aware of anywhere where the code depends on the flags
having a particular value, please let me know.
If I have time, I also hope to look at doing rework on the testpmd flag
handling based off Olivier's previous patches, but since that is not
affecting the public ABI, I consider it a bit lower priority.
Thanks,
/Bruce
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> index 1c6e115..c9fc4ec 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> @@ -86,26 +86,26 @@ extern "C" {
> #define PKT_RX_IEEE1588_PTP 0x0200 /**< RX IEEE1588 L2 Ethernet PT Packet. */
> #define PKT_RX_IEEE1588_TMST 0x0400 /**< RX IEEE1588 L2/L4 timestamped packet.*/
>
> -#define PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT 0x0800 /**< TX packet is a 802.1q VLAN packet. */
> -#define PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM 0x1000 /**< IP cksum of TX pkt. computed by NIC. */
> -#define PKT_TX_IPV4_CSUM 0x1000 /**< Alias of PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM. */
> -#define PKT_TX_IPV4 PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR /**< IPv4 with no IP checksum offload. */
> -#define PKT_TX_IPV6 PKT_RX_IPV6_HDR /**< IPv6 packet */
> +#define PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT (0x0001 << 32) /**< TX packet is a 802.1q VLAN packet. */
> +#define PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM (0x0002 << 32) /**< IP cksum of TX pkt. computed by NIC. */
> +#define PKT_TX_IPV4_CSUM PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM /**< Alias of PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM. */
> +#define PKT_TX_IPV4 PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR /**< IPv4 with no IP checksum offload. */
> +#define PKT_TX_IPV6 PKT_RX_IPV6_HDR /**< IPv6 packet */
>
> /*
> - * Bit 14~13 used for L4 packet type with checksum enabled.
> + * Bit 35~34 used for L4 packet type with checksum enabled.
> * 00: Reserved
> * 01: TCP checksum
> * 10: SCTP checksum
> * 11: UDP checksum
> */
> -#define PKT_TX_L4_MASK 0x6000 /**< Mask bits for L4 checksum offload request. */
> -#define PKT_TX_L4_NO_CKSUM 0x0000 /**< Disable L4 cksum of TX pkt. */
> -#define PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM 0x2000 /**< TCP cksum of TX pkt. computed by NIC. */
> -#define PKT_TX_SCTP_CKSUM 0x4000 /**< SCTP cksum of TX pkt. computed by NIC. */
> -#define PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM 0x6000 /**< UDP cksum of TX pkt. computed by NIC. */
> -/* Bit 15 */
> -#define PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST 0x8000 /**< TX IEEE1588 packet to timestamp. */
> +#define PKT_TX_L4_NO_CKSUM (0x0000 << 32) /**< Disable L4 cksum of TX pkt. */
> +#define PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM (0x0004 << 32) /**< TCP cksum of TX pkt. computed by NIC. */
> +#define PKT_TX_SCTP_CKSUM (0x0008 << 32) /**< SCTP cksum of TX pkt. computed by NIC. */
> +#define PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM (0x000C << 32) /**< UDP cksum of TX pkt. computed by NIC. */
> +#define PKT_TX_L4_MASK (0x000C << 32) /**< Mask for L4 cksum offload request. */
> +/* Bit 36 */
> +#define PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST (0x0010 << 32) /**< TX IEEE1588 packet to timestamp. */
>
> /* Use final bit of flags to indicate a control mbuf */
> #define CTRL_MBUF_FLAG (1ULL << 63)
> --
> 1.9.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-30 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-30 15:26 Bruce Richardson
2014-09-30 15:33 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2014-09-30 16:00 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
2014-09-30 16:03 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-09-30 17:06 ` Neil Horman
2014-10-01 8:47 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-10-01 11:14 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140930153348.GA13504@BRICHA3-MOBL \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).