From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCE67E1F for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 23:04:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 59A8280B615; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:10:55 -0700 From: Matthew Hall To: Neil Horman Message-ID: <20141002211055.GA30270@mhcomputing.net> References: <1412265386-26291-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> <20141002172634.GE4900@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20141002200420.GB29590@mhcomputing.net> <20141002202451.GF4900@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141002202451.GF4900@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Fix build issues with CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS=y X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 21:04:41 -0000 On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:24:51PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > This seems somewhat irrelevant to the patch. The default configuration is > already the way you want it to be, shared library performance is actually very > close to static performance, and yes, people can choose how they want to build. > Not sure what point your trying to make here. > Neil According to my reading, one of the subpatches threatened to disable the single static libs when the grouped one is built. If you are working with multiple DPDK apps, and one expects COMBINE_LIBS and the other does not, you can't use both with the same copy of DPDK anymore if that subpatch gets committed. Matthew.