From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9888AE82 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 20:06:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6354280B615; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:13:07 -0700 From: Matthew Hall To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20141003181307.GB1741@mhcomputing.net> References: <1412265386-26291-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> <2041475.WSUx3LgNfR@xps13> <20141003081019.GA28988@sivswdev02.ir.intel.com> <2274825.SfVmqUQfpO@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2274825.SfVmqUQfpO@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Fix build issues with CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS=y X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 18:06:50 -0000 On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 10:27:30AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > The proposal is to always build single (combined) lib AND to build separated > libs in case of shared libraries. > For static library: only one single (combined) static library. In the static case, this won't be backward compatible for people with existing linking, and won't allow people to pick which PMD's to activate without recompiling DPDK. If you're OK with that then I don't have an issue. But some others may not like it. Matthew.