From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
 [209.85.212.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8B57E80
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:24:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h11so3113513wiw.13
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=+QzGR9yqknfFMRKkC5NAjoZxoECtGL/BvCePyoWnMpU=;
 b=mfzrioGI85/b1XZ7k2hBNt1GkFYDl5S859SfcLpsTlJ0+SnqEPzGozjuhOFpI4b2VR
 0Ax/l2zwUwdl1YB28VVupN9Kk0315w6OJlZ3jqTbJXIzItZNAeGijcSb7AG92Ho4YJGu
 HmYeHrPQxH8wTu8KpRx5twdrjw4JonRiIKCVI+g6B/Rg2Mg5Q6xw1Cmop95odNIzN+fc
 fKOOhiwBXGkBPSAgNDoqF33uWfvVIJ4uG85yogF2YQqXbWux2olrX2zKKmPnNOBgD0XK
 qsWBV2Wud6HYZHieSKJOGu7Jy8vDSbWqv4cMOT+akQIgGLBtmor5zrTjrwr+rJEhDgGS
 +pgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkJ4IiUfd1vWf1zJYyFYKvHppzCPMcGaEMqdzBkGouvpzjgJbPurkCPiyHBUqQRTmCvMvEa
X-Received: by 10.180.211.11 with SMTP id my11mr4109978wic.15.1413192724689;
 Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uryu.home.lan ([62.156.150.204])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lf1sm15972529wjb.24.2014.10.13.02.31.59
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:31:46 +0200
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
Message-ID: <20141013113146.202b5eb3@uryu.home.lan>
In-Reply-To: <1413181389-14887-2-git-send-email-yongwang@vmware.com>
References: <1413181389-14887-1-git-send-email-yongwang@vmware.com>
 <1413181389-14887-2-git-send-email-yongwang@vmware.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] vmxnet3: Fix VLAN Rx stripping
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:24:25 -0000

On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 23:23:05 -0700
Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com> wrote:

> Shouldn't reset vlan_tci to 0 if a valid VLAN tag is stripped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>

Since vlan_tci is initialized to zero by rte_pktmbuf layer,
the driver shouldn't be messing with it.