DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] Possible bug in eal_pci pci_scan_one
@ 2014-10-06  9:13 Matthew Hall
  2014-10-14  5:47 ` Matthew Hall
  2014-10-24 13:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Hall @ 2014-10-06  9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Hi Guys,

I'm doing my development on kind of a cheap machine with no NUMA support... 
but several years ago I used DPDK to build a NUMA box that could do 40 gbits 
bidirectional L4-L7 stateful traffic replay.

So given the past experiences I had before, I wanted to clean the code up so 
it'd work well if some crazy guy tried my code on one of these huge boxes, 
too, but then I ran into some weird issues.

1) When I call rte_eth_dev_socket_id() I get back -1. But the call can return 
-1 if the port_id is bogus or if pci_scan_one didn't get a numa_node (because 
you're on a non-NUMA box for example).

int rte_eth_dev_socket_id(uint8_t port_id)
        if (port_id >= nb_ports)
                return -1;
        return rte_eth_devices[port_id].pci_dev->numa_node;

So you couldn't tell the different between non-NUMA or a bad port value, etc.

2) The code's behavior and comments disagree with one another. In the 
pci_scan_one function, there's this code:

/* get numa node */
snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s/numa_node",
if (access(filename, R_OK) != 0) {
        /* if no NUMA support just set node to 0 */
        dev->numa_node = -1;
} else {
        if (eal_parse_sysfs_value(filename, &tmp) < 0) {
                return -1;
        dev->numa_node = tmp;

It says, just use NUMA node 0 if there is no NUMA support. But then proceeds 
to set the value to -1 in disagreement with the comment, and also stomping on 
the other meaning for -1 in the higher function rte_eth_dev_socket_id.

3) In conclusion, it seems like some stuff is missing... first there needs to 
be a function that will tell you the number of NUMA nodes present on the box 
so you can create the right number of mbuf_pools, but I couldn't find that function.

Then if you have the function, you can do some magic and shuffle the NICs 
around to get them hooked to a core on the same NUMA, and the mbuf_pool on the 
same NUMA.

When NUMA is not present, can we return 0 instead of -1, or return a specific 
error code that the client can use to know he should just use Socket 0? Right 
now I can't tell apart any potential errors or weird values from correct 

4) I'm willing to help make and test some patches... but first I want to 
understand what is happening with these funny functions before doing things 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-24 18:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-06  9:13 [dpdk-dev] Possible bug in eal_pci pci_scan_one Matthew Hall
2014-10-14  5:47 ` Matthew Hall
2014-10-23  0:44   ` Matthew Hall
2014-10-24 13:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-10-24 19:03   ` Matthew Hall

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git