From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED44F7F2C for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 01:52:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 76E7680BDA8; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:01:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:01:18 -0800 From: Matthew Hall To: Newman Poborsky Message-ID: <20141111010118.GA22047@mhcomputing.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] building shared library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:52:48 -0000 On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:22:40PM +0100, Newman Poborsky wrote: > is it possible to build a dpdk app as a shared library? Yes it will work, with a bit of performance loss from the .so symbol lookup overhead. You have to set some of the build config options to get it to work though. Matthew.