From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4538C590F for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:06:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from hmsreliant.think-freely.org ([2001:470:8:a08:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1XsxGQ-00067M-Qh; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:17:31 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:17:26 -0500 From: Neil Horman To: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: <20141124171725.GB7532@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <1416692622-28886-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <20141123013517.GA3982@localhost.localdomain> <20141124112819.GA11552@bricha3-MOBL3> <4662010.O9okd8Allt@xps13> <20141124132821.GA11116@bricha3-MOBL3> <54734618.1020905@intel.com> <7E169FC8-CED0-4DD1-B2DA-CAAAFFBD7231@icloud.com> <20141124170445.GA7532@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Status: No Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/10] eal: add core list input format X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:06:48 -0000 On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:11:16PM +0000, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:12:33AM -0600, Roger Keith Wiles wrote: > > > Burn, it is not like we are going to add a huge number of new options in the > > future and run out of letters. > > > > > No, but what about the application authors that need to accomodate all of > > the dpdk command line options as well? > > Neil > > Hi Neil > > I don't think that's a problem as all those parameters are separated with a --. I.e. ./testpmd -c f -n 2 -- . Is that not the case? > I don't know, I've not tried, though I'm still not a fan of having a command line that takes the form: -c 0xnnnn -- -c ... That just looks confusing to me. Neil > Thanks, > Anatoly >