From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Added Spinlock to l3fwd-vf example to prevent race conditioning
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:38:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141210153837.1f30eed8@urahara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141210161646.GE17040@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:16:46 -0500
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> This really seems like a false savings to me. If an application intends to use
> multiple processes (which by all rights it seems like the use case that the dpdk
> is mostly designed for) then you need locking one way or another, and you've
> just made application coding harder, because the application now needs to know
> which functions might have internal critical sections that they need to provide
> locking for.
The DPDK is not Linux.
See the examples of how to route without using locks by doing asymmetric multiprocessing.
I.e queues are only serviced by one CPU.
The cost of a locked operation (even uncontended) is often enough to drop
packet performance by several million PPS.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-08 11:16 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Daniel Mrzyglod
2014-07-23 8:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-11 22:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-11 23:18 ` Xie, Huawei
2014-12-08 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] " Neil Horman
2014-12-10 8:18 ` Wodkowski, PawelX
2014-12-10 14:47 ` Neil Horman
2014-12-10 14:54 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-12-10 15:53 ` Mrzyglod, DanielX T
2014-12-10 16:16 ` Neil Horman
2014-12-10 23:38 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2014-12-11 0:34 ` Neil Horman
2014-12-10 10:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-11 1:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141210153837.1f30eed8@urahara \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).