DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: fix build with shared pcap pmd
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:58:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141216135822.GC13806@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418684684-23642-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:04:44AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Some applications doesn't have the pcap link flag
> when shared libraries are enabled.
> Indeed in such case, pcap PMD must not be linked but pcap library should.
> 
> Actually -lpcap is always needed if pcap PMD is used,
> and -lrte_pmd_pcap must be set only with static PMD library.
> So the flags -lrte_pmd_pcap and -lpcap are enabled separately.
> 
> Workarounds in test-pmd/ and test-pipeline/ can be removed.
> 
> Reported-by: Stepan Sojka <stepan.sojka@adaptivemobile.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
> ---
> 
> v2:
> fix in rte.app.mk
> 
> v1 from Stepan:
> fix every applications
> 
>  app/test-pipeline/Makefile | 4 ----
>  app/test-pmd/Makefile      | 4 ----
>  mk/rte.app.mk              | 6 +++++-
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pipeline/Makefile b/app/test-pipeline/Makefile
> index b81652f..aa6df0c 100644
> --- a/app/test-pipeline/Makefile
> +++ b/app/test-pipeline/Makefile
> @@ -41,10 +41,6 @@ APP = testpipeline
>  CFLAGS += -O3
>  CFLAGS += $(WERROR_FLAGS)
>  
> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_PCAP),y)
> -LDFLAGS += -lpcap
> -endif
> -
>  #
>  # all source are stored in SRCS-y
>  #
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/Makefile b/app/test-pmd/Makefile
> index 97dc2e6..dcf26f4 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/Makefile
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/Makefile
> @@ -41,10 +41,6 @@ APP = testpmd
>  CFLAGS += -O3
>  CFLAGS += $(WERROR_FLAGS)
>  
> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_PCAP),y)
> -LDFLAGS += -lpcap
> -endif
> -
>  #
>  # all source are stored in SRCS-y
>  #
> diff --git a/mk/rte.app.mk b/mk/rte.app.mk
> index 84ec4df..c5eaf82 100644
> --- a/mk/rte.app.mk
> +++ b/mk/rte.app.mk
> @@ -119,6 +119,10 @@ LDLIBS += -lm
>  LDLIBS += -lrt
>  endif
>  
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_PCAP),y)
> +LDLIBS += -lpcap
> +endif
> +
>  LDLIBS += --start-group
>  
>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_KVARGS),y)
> @@ -207,7 +211,7 @@ LDLIBS += -lrte_pmd_ring
>  endif
>  
>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_PCAP),y)
> -LDLIBS += -lrte_pmd_pcap -lpcap
> +LDLIBS += -lrte_pmd_pcap
>  endif
>  
>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_AF_PACKET),y)
> -- 
> 2.1.3
> 
> 

Actually, what if we just add $(LDFLAGS) to the O_TO_S rule in mk/rte.lib.mk?
Then in lib/librte_pmd_pcap/Makefile, we can just add LDFLAGS+=-lpcap, and the
loading of the pcap pmd will itself require the loading of libpcap.  That would
be a nice clean implementation that allows applications to just link the pmd and
not have to worry about dependencies.  It would also allow us to clean up other
dependencies like the xenvirt pmd and vhost.

Neil

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-16 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-06 23:14 [dpdk-dev] [pcap PATCH] pcap: fix build of all-in-one shared library stepan
2014-12-08 14:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-dev, pcap] " Neil Horman
2014-12-15 22:42   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-15 23:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: fix build with shared pcap pmd Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-16 13:58       ` Neil Horman [this message]
2014-12-16 14:39         ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-16 21:42           ` Neil Horman
2014-12-16 23:37             ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141216135822.GC13806@hmsreliant.think-freely.org \
    --to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).