From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886FC68AA
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:27:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2014 07:25:04 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,594,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="625295046"
Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.243.20.28])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2014 07:27:19 -0800
Received: by  (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:27:19 +0025
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:27:19 +0000
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Jay Rolette <rolette@infiniteio.com>
Message-ID: <20141217152718.GG9184@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <1418823077-9129-1-git-send-email-rolette@infiniteio.com>
 <1667884.VTnHUhe7ya@xps13>
 <CADNuJVpObspy7zW6D4Aww8LZNezgP8twrYp_Hej5ZFD1+L0ZKQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADNuJVpObspy7zW6D4Aww8LZNezgP8twrYp_Hej5ZFD1+L0ZKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: Dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] replaced O(n^2) sort in sort_by_physaddr()
 with qsort() from standard library
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:27:52 -0000

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 09:07:45AM -0600, Jay Rolette wrote:
>
> > Comments shall be C-style (/* */).
> >
> 
> Single line comments ('//') have been part of the C standard since C99. Is
> DPDK following C89 or is this just a style thing? If it is a style thing, a
> link to a page with the rubric would be helpful. I didn't see one on the
> submission guidelines.
>
To to add here that I'd love to see the coding guidelines relaxed to allow
"//" style comments!

/Bruce