From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472E568BF for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:25:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from hmsreliant.think-freely.org ([2001:470:8:a08:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1ZCu-0003XM-73; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:25:29 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:25:23 -0500 From: Neil Horman To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20141218112523.GA18008@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <1418835808-18803-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <2522675.0gKbYfjInz@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2522675.0gKbYfjInz@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Status: No Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] xenvirt: Fix build break on cmdline_parse_etheraddr call X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:25:31 -0000 On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:20:26PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Neil, > > 2014-12-17 12:03, Neil Horman: > > Back in: > > > > commit aaa662e75c23c61a1d79bd4d1f9f35b4967c39db > > Author: Alan Carew > > Date: Fri Dec 5 15:19:07 2014 +0100 > > > > cmdline: fix overflow on bsd > > > > The author failed to fixup a call to cmdline_parse_etheraddr in xenvirt. This > > patch makes the needed correction to avoid a build break > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman > > CC: Thomas Monjalon > > What is the meaning of CC here? > CC is a tag that git send-email understands. As it implies it cc's the post to the indicated email, and records that fact in the body of the commit. > > --- a/lib/librte_pmd_xenvirt/rte_eth_xenvirt.c > > +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_xenvirt/rte_eth_xenvirt.c > > @@ -586,8 +586,9 @@ rte_eth_xenvirt_parse_args(struct xenvirt_dict *dict, > > if (!strncmp(pair[0], RTE_ETH_XENVIRT_MAC_PARAM, > > sizeof(RTE_ETH_XENVIRT_MAC_PARAM))) { > > if (cmdline_parse_etheraddr(NULL, > > - pair[1], > > - &dict->addr) < 0) { > > + pair[1], > > + &dict->addr, > > + sizeof(struct ether_addr)) < 0) { > > Why not sizeof(dict->addr)? > Because addr is a struct ether_addr, and I always get confused when doing sizeof on pointer variables, so I find it more clear to specify the type exactly. I'm not bound to it though so if you like I can change it, though given its release day, I figure you want to fix this build break asap. Neil > -- > Thomas >