From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BDDA0C45; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:36:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E054069E; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:36:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA0040151; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CBB5C0287; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 11:36:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 11:36:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= nbgxYS9Ynge21ZwNgtqh7970lrt6zghEEAogHEvB7no=; b=WAbkjB75gZ5TXwgj sFrdgG9lk7YywwAb6NpqwAJWVLWPowZo1B7tM/Q/ndKsFlj+jL9CfE4QSdaJOnxv fIktsJg0qNoolrkHgMEeS9nDkLkt3CrDF8ENtuQr7+FlgzaI3nzjIbOD9ugoLbGj NaRKQMzYiVmeKob4BHIDVtSjUxfalAuJhY9rUd+rtk2D2rfYkiT/ObEA9ymAZMTQ pKEAQFzpUvs0pouX+1Lrh7Kf0Jyncb3RB204/Oav1UaqfqlpGGoNt3oZPlEOrBTB vh44SEoWKi+iU1my9rVRrFYIXPXtzAN9cx/QfKc0j0P5xnfdFXdsT95BkYL+6Mty wPqMnw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=nbgxYS9Ynge21ZwNgtqh7970lrt6zghEEAogHEvB7 no=; b=wY6YyePpavnEXFmV/o754dKs8Lejkq1layJ4VsqrbWmVUVaZU6X/SIx+A JllecHGqmbnpyFZo3wuRaOYSyKOFD7fKs0PBcM+nnhKn8Yqy3nMqrBTL1P82DY2l P01D1+WoZSxWfedzNtIdQStPUmL2HRWtu3X50JgIKTCs/OG/SCFgTg0InZDoGbbc ae4v19T/J/2tqMQVNLbrKRIRx2iOOd361PouGO5YmnJHH34OsnL+MC99d0ti9ban D9j8g7CANY4If/CX2+YA9BD8R7ak3G/JjWCrpmpjkJO8Keld1utQ2W8/vdBdL4YR xXmtln0I64ZBiYYZT3ufZlMhyE4WA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudehgedgkeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 11:36:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Van Haaren, Harry" Cc: Ruifeng Wang , "Varghese, Vipin" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "nd@arm.com" , "honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com" , "stable@dpdk.org" Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:36:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20147931.bK9rSLiBgN@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210830080412.1548336-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/service_cores: fix lcore count check X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 31/08/2021 18:09, Van Haaren, Harry: > From: Ruifeng Wang > > Fixes: 7f6ee6aee717 ("examples/service_cores: check cores before run") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Cc: vipin.varghese@intel.com > > > > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang > > Change makes sense to me, this was introduced in Oct 2020 > so a backport to 20.11 LTS makes sense I think. Backport is not only for official announced branches. The backport mark may be used to maintain some private branches as well.