From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29C85A3E for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:29:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2015 02:29:24 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,698,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="664498919" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.243.20.27]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 05 Jan 2015 02:29:22 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:29:21 +0025 Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:29:21 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: "Ouyang, Changchun" Message-ID: <20150105102920.GA13152@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1419389808-9559-1-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com> <1419398584-19520-1-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com> <1419398584-19520-6-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com> <549A97F6.30901@cloudius-systems.com> <549C0F10.8050402@cloudius-systems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] ixgbe: Config VF RSS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:29:26 -0000 On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 01:52:25AM +0000, Ouyang, Changchun wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz@cloudius-systems.com] > > Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 9:20 PM > > To: Ouyang, Changchun; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] ixgbe: Config VF RSS > > > > > Like I said before, trying to guess what user wants is a way to making a code > > that is very hard to use and to maintain. Pls., just return an error and let the > > user code deal with it the way he/she really wants and not the way u *think* > > he/she wants. > > > I didn't disagree on this, either :-) > If you have strong reason for this way and more guys agree with it, > I will modify it probably in v4. > > > +1 on returning error.