DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Prashant Upadhyaya <praupadhyaya@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Packet Rx issue with DPDK1.8
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:47:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150108134728.GA2536@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPBAu3UCua6QWpJnhpJ7nkPBvjbN5b88iTD1ZAh+DfY9Eb6BFA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:40:54PM +0530, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am migrating from DPDK1.7 to DPDK1.8.
> My application works fine with DPDK1.7.
> I am using 10 Gb Intel 82599 NIC.
> I have jumbo frames enabled, with max_rx_pkt_len = 10232
> My mbuf dataroom size is 2048+headroom
> So naturally the ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts driver function is triggered for
> receiving.
> This works with DPDK1.7 and my app receives packets.
> However, it does not work with DPDK1.8 somehow.I don't receive any packets.
> 
> So, I increased the mbuf data room size in my application to a higher value
> so that the function ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts is not enabled (I believe
> ixgbe_recv_pkts will be used in this case), and now my application starts
> getting packets with DPDK1.8 and the entire application usecase works fine
> (ofcourse my application had to adapt to the mbuf structure changes which I
> have done)
> 
> I am kind of coming to the conclusion that ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts has
> something broken in DPDK1.8 as compared to the earlier versions by the
> above empirical evidence.
> 
> Has anybody else faced a similar issue ?
> 
> Regards
> -Prashant

This is worrying to hear. In 1.8, there is now the receive_scattered_pkts_vec
function which manages changed mbufs. This was tested - both in development and
in validation - before release, but since it's new code, it's entirely possible
we missed something. Can you perhaps try disabling the vector driver in 1.8,
and see if receiving scattered packets/chained mbufs works? 

Regards,
/Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-08 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-08  8:10 Prashant Upadhyaya
2015-01-08 13:47 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2015-01-09  6:45   ` Prashant Upadhyaya
2015-01-09  9:26     ` Bruce Richardson
2015-01-14 16:30       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-14 17:01         ` Bruce Richardson
2015-01-14 18:33         ` [dpdk-dev] New to DPDK Ravi Rao
2015-01-14 19:27           ` Wiles, Keith
2015-01-14 19:54             ` Ravi Rao
     [not found]               ` <D0DC2CB2.FCE3%keith.wiles@intel.com>
2015-01-21 21:00                 ` Ravi Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150108134728.GA2536@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=praupadhyaya@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).