From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A9D58F7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:02:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2015 09:02:00 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,757,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="669873987"
Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.243.20.18])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2015 09:01:58 -0800
Received: by  (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:01:57 +0025
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:01:57 +0000
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20150114170157.GA11364@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <CAPBAu3UCua6QWpJnhpJ7nkPBvjbN5b88iTD1ZAh+DfY9Eb6BFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <afa8e0d5ea2a487db82e6cbb8c59de2d@GURMBXV02.AD.ARICENT.COM>
 <20150109092659.GA11296@bricha3-MOBL3> <2334334.VuS9a0PCxR@xps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2334334.VuS9a0PCxR@xps13>
Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Packet Rx issue with DPDK1.8
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:02:14 -0000

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:30:15PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-01-09 09:26, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 06:45:57AM +0000, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
> > > Hi Bruce,
> > > 
> > > I tried with your suggestion.
> > > 
> > > When I disable the _vec function with the following config change, the
> > > usecase works for me. So it points to some issue in the _vec function.
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR=y, I changed this parameter to
> > > CONFIG_RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR=n
> > > 
> > > There appears to be some gottcha in the function therefore, somebody may
> > > want to run some tests again perhaps with jumbo frames enabled (and
> > > sending small normal frames)
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > -Prashant
> > 
> > Yes, we'll perform additional testing and see what we can turn up.
> 
> Bruce, any news about this bug?
> It seems important and could justify (with other bugs) to release a version
> 1.8.1.
> 
> Thanks
> -- 
> Thomas

No updates on my end yet. I'll keep you informed as I get any extra info here.

/Bruce