Re: [dpdk-dev] Why nothing since 1.8.0?

[Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>]

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:51:38AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-01-15 04:27, Ouyang, Changchun:
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhang, Helin
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
> > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:23:52PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > > Ok, so 1.8.0 came out almost a month ago and none of the patches
> > > > > that were deferred waiting for the release got merged since then.
> > > > > Last commit in git is the 1.8.0 release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Where is the post-merge window bundle, where are the later commits?
> > > > > Lots of patches are sitting rotting in patchwork...
> > > >
> > > > +1, I've had the same questions.
> > > > Neil
> > > 
> > > +1, Some patch set might be ready for being merged.
> > 
> > +1,  the earlier some patches are merged into mainline, and the easier those
> > sequent patch sets can resolve their conflicts.
> 
> +1, there are some patches which are properly reviewed
> 
> Reminder: sub-tree to manage specific part of DPDK can be open on request
> 
Ok, I think what you're saying here is you're too busy to handle all the patches
comming in at the moment.  As such I'd like to propose a sub-tree encompassing
all the pmds in DPDK.  I would envision that including all the acutal pmd's in
the tree, as well as the infrastructure that is used to interface them to the
core (i.e. the ethdev/rte_ether library).  I'll gladly maintain the patch pool
and send you pull requests.

If you could set me up with a login to dpdk.org, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks!
Neil

> -- 
> Thomas, back on track
>