From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5664758F7 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:06:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from hmsreliant.think-freely.org ([2001:470:8:a08:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1YBk7s-0008Os-VU; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:06:21 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:06:16 -0500 From: Neil Horman To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20150115130616.GA22455@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <20150114122352.63ef79eb@urahara> <1717148.0lUn7GOqmp@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1717148.0lUn7GOqmp@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Status: No Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why nothing since 1.8.0? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:06:25 -0000 On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:51:38AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-01-15 04:27, Ouyang, Changchun: > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhang, Helin > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:23:52PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > Ok, so 1.8.0 came out almost a month ago and none of the patches > > > > > that were deferred waiting for the release got merged since then. > > > > > Last commit in git is the 1.8.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > Where is the post-merge window bundle, where are the later commits? > > > > > Lots of patches are sitting rotting in patchwork... > > > > > > > > +1, I've had the same questions. > > > > Neil > > > > > > +1, Some patch set might be ready for being merged. > > > > +1, the earlier some patches are merged into mainline, and the easier those > > sequent patch sets can resolve their conflicts. > > +1, there are some patches which are properly reviewed > > Reminder: sub-tree to manage specific part of DPDK can be open on request > Ok, I think what you're saying here is you're too busy to handle all the patches comming in at the moment. As such I'd like to propose a sub-tree encompassing all the pmds in DPDK. I would envision that including all the acutal pmd's in the tree, as well as the infrastructure that is used to interface them to the core (i.e. the ethdev/rte_ether library). I'll gladly maintain the patch pool and send you pull requests. If you could set me up with a login to dpdk.org, I'd appreciate it. Thanks! Neil > -- > Thomas, back on track >