From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525A75A7E for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:56:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2015 02:53:44 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,410,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="638277077" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.243.20.34]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2015 02:56:29 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:56:28 +0025 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:56:28 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: Kamraan Nasim Message-ID: <20150116105627.GB10516@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <20150114102722.GC10476@bricha3-MOBL3> <20150115144449.GA1880@bricha3-MOBL3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ean Houts , Jun Du Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Does I210 NIC support Flow director filters? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:56:33 -0000 On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:06:52PM -0500, Kamraan Nasim wrote: > >>> update the RSS RETA table so that traffic doesn't get sent > >> to that queue via RSS. Is that what you are asking? > > Thanks Bruce, that's exactly it. Basically each filter will forward > traffic to a unique RSS queue which can allow me to calculate filter match > statistics for that queue(or filter). At that point I would like to drop > the filtered packet. Is there any way to drop the filtered packet in the > RSS queue without doing a rte_eth_rx_burst() and dropping it then? > > --Kam > I don't believe there is any other way to drop them from the queue other than RX and drop. It's not the most efficient way to do so (since you have to allocate, fill and free an mbuf), but it's the only way that an app can do so without adding new functions to the driver(s). /Bruce