From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why nothing since 1.8.0?
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:00:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150116200057.GG27496@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150116185852.GA29426@mhcomputing.net>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:58:52AM -0800, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:18:19PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > I'd like to try solving the review challenge first and see what else can be
> > done after that. Step by step.
>
> FWIW, I know the kernel guys seem to really love it, but not everybody else
> has much fun trying to do the reviews reading huge patch emails. I lose a lot
> of context trying to stare at them in mutt 80x25 console etc.
Well, ok, then don't use mutt, no one mandates it. You can setup
outlook/thunderbird/evolution/MTA of choice to format email properly for lkml
pretty easily.
> It would be nice
> if we could have a visual interface with syntax highlighting and comment
> capabilities, that's easier to read through quickly and clearly, like
> ReviewBoard, GitHub Pull Request UI, etc. If it had email integration to reply
> to the patch threads that'd be great too.
>
Like Gerrit:
https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/
Its easy enough to setup your own instance and point it at your own tree for
review purposes.
> Also if we had some branches available where conceptually related changes are
> grouped, somebody could check out the branch with some feature they wanted to
> try, get all the related patches, integrate with their app of choice, and see
> if the app works successfully with the new feature.
>
That would be the master branch of a subtree, if the granularity was correct.
> Some of these things like DPDK, it isn't obvious how the feature will help or
> hurt, until you write some code against it and/or benchmark it first, because
> some of these features are kind of complicated.
>
> Another thing... if we had some kind of wiki page, where some of the backend
> coders could mark themselves as maintainers of all the different features they
> work on, and more client-side network stack guys like me could express
> interest in certain features, we could connect the two sides so any given guy
> knows who can review his bugfix he found, or try out his new patchset to see
> if it works well in an app.
>
Thats what the MAINTAINERS file and --subject-prefix options in git-send-email
are commonly used for
Neil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-16 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 20:23 Stephen Hemminger
2015-01-14 21:01 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-15 4:15 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-01-15 4:27 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2015-01-15 9:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-15 13:06 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-15 17:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-15 18:51 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-15 21:55 ` O'driscoll, Tim
2015-01-16 1:46 ` Matthew Hall
2015-01-16 7:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-16 16:51 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-17 19:57 ` O'driscoll, Tim
2015-01-18 0:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
[not found] ` <20150118182508.GA21891@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
2015-01-18 21:48 ` O'driscoll, Tim
2015-01-19 13:30 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-15 22:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-16 17:20 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-16 18:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-16 18:58 ` Matthew Hall
2015-01-16 20:00 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2015-01-16 20:38 ` Matthew Hall
2015-01-16 21:14 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-16 22:43 ` Matthew Hall
2015-01-16 19:53 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-16 14:51 ` Marc Sune
2015-01-16 16:56 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150116200057.GG27496@hmsreliant.think-freely.org \
--to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mhall@mhcomputing.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).