From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C47D5A3D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:14:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hmsreliant.think-freely.org
 ([2001:470:8:a08:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] helo=localhost)
 by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63)
 (envelope-from <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>)
 id 1YCEE3-0005Fp-6Q; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:14:41 -0500
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:14:38 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Message-ID: <20150116211438.GA22909@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
References: <20150114122352.63ef79eb@urahara> <2507392.XzU56ErIKp@xps13>
 <20150116172017.GE27496@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
 <2188823.ZBC1oOX6oS@xps13> <20150116185852.GA29426@mhcomputing.net>
 <20150116200057.GG27496@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
 <20150116203848.GA31715@mhcomputing.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150116203848.GA31715@mhcomputing.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Status: No
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why nothing since 1.8.0?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:14:44 -0000

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:38:48PM -0800, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:00:57PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Like Gerrit:
> > https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/
> 
> Maybe we could work on setting up a community copy? I'd prefer if we could 
> avoid n=1 and make our community as strong as possible.
> 
Sure, Its a bit orthogonal to this conversation, but I think its a fine idea to
have if it aids in general reviewing.  Thomas can it be setup on dpdk.org?

Neil
> Matthew.
>