From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com (mail-pd0-f178.google.com [209.85.192.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C475A15 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 01:53:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id y10so13438909pdj.9 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:53:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ynL1s/7rs6R4p0wR4dNT89vWfCQu3WlS6qIRFeu5PM0=; b=ERrMbyB+Q2j2zqSRB6Aytz4/egyovYDOWfKYpSymIttbP/3Z564Gj7/Swd17wjfcg2 ZoPIuFhSQD4dLus5/yPt9YOiL2dW4bEydMDFPIxrJd6z3QNM7r1n+g+TC/cxb6om2ILE FvGD/On5XDUP2BccGJuGt+dw1ncMH0wuUJFDr8am5YZM3K0XO0mSDnNTOIWBv0K81Q37 656jWTPI4y7fOrhUOUuh+wj+UpjA8oroXPKyS3/kBin92e/iV0CsNBOMsq0XdI7MtaZ5 LqKJBKjITrSekOH6sO40CGsUR67uX9kUknaU4AQYO3RS/YpVwsb7alkgYtz0YpyP5Np4 XQdw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkjYJQt0gOiNjOVSwf5bQ+xtZdGXtdq5+fMjiQ3ANbRAlnfSbBE+pi5YAefyhb843uMuSPF X-Received: by 10.70.92.3 with SMTP id ci3mr66928002pdb.28.1421888006233; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:53:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from urahara (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gw8sm7065675pbc.48.2015.01.21.16.53.23 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:53:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:53:17 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Jim Thompson Message-ID: <20150121165317.1bb03c3c@urahara> In-Reply-To: <53D2253B-DE20-486E-ADF0-DA02AAB1EF35@netgate.com> References: <20150119130221.GB21790@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20150120151118.GD18449@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20150120161453.GA5316@bricha3-MOBL3> <54BF9D59.7070104@bisdn.de> <20150121130234.GB10756@bricha3-MOBL3> <54BFA7D5.7020106@bisdn.de> <20150121132620.GC10756@bricha3-MOBL3> <20150121114947.0753ae87@urahara> <20150121205404.GB32617@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <53D2253B-DE20-486E-ADF0-DA02AAB1EF35@netgate.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] DPDK memcpy optimization X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:53:27 -0000 On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:25:40 -0600 Jim Thompson wrote: > I=E2=80=99m not as concerned with compile times given the potential perfo= rmance boost. Compile time matters. Right now full build of large project is fast. Like 2 minutes or less. Is this only the test applications (which can be disabled from the build), or the library trying to do some tests. Since the build and target environm= ent will be different on a real product, the whole scheme seems flawed.