From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4364FAD86 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 23:15:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2015 14:15:09 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,515,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="672277145" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([134.134.171.68]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 03 Feb 2015 14:15:06 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 03 Feb 2015 15:15:08 -0600 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 15:15:08 -0700 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20150203221507.GA5476@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1543668.33DNSY5Q47@xps13> <1704782.cYXBnscZcm@xps13> <20150203190440.GA5112@bricha3-MOBL3> <8420728.CIi4GzGLqo@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8420728.CIi4GzGLqo@xps13> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] deadline for 2.0 features proposal X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:15:12 -0000 On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 09:24:28PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-02-03 12:04, Bruce Richardson: > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:40:41AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > These features were planned in the 2.0 roadmap but not submitted: > > > - cuckoo hash > > > - packet distributor (phase 2) > > > - bifurcated driver, assuming availability in Linux kernel > > > - Broadcom driver > > > - Hyper-V driver > > > - i40e QoS > > > - i40e IEEE1588 > > > - i40e DCB > > > - i40e SR-IOV switching > > > - i40e port mirroring > > > > > > They are now in the 2.1 roadmap. > > > If you are working on one of these features or plan to do, > > > please confirm their status and the estimated integration window. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > There are no enhancements to the packet distributor lib which will be ready for > > inclusion inside the 2.0 timeframe. > > But there will be something new for 2.1? > What means "phase 2"? > > Thanks > -- > Thomas I'm currently doing some investigation work in this area, to see what ways we can improve performance or use other distribution schemes. Depending on what comes out of the investigations, there may or may not be improvements to push in the 2.1 timeframe. It's too early to know at this point. Regards, /Bruce