DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test: fix missing NULL pointer checks
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:45:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150210114523.GA18684@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422616493-3192-1-git-send-email-danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:14:53PM +0100, Daniel Mrzyglod wrote:
> In test_sched, we are missing NULL pointer checks after create_mempool()
> and rte_pktmbuf_alloc(). Add in these checks using TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL
> macros.
> 
> VERIFY macro was removed and replaced by standard test ASSERTS from
> "test.h" header.
> This provides additional information to track when the failure occured.
> 
> v4 changes:
> -If test fails add cleanup routines
> -Change Magic Numbers to dedicated Macro RTE_DIM
This V4 adds in significant new changes to those described in the patch title.
I think it needs to be split into separate patches, so that we can have
a single simple patch adding in the additional null tests. The rework of the
macros and the switch to have global variables and clean-up routines should be
in separate patches.

Check spelling of mbuf as "mbuff" a few times below. Also, can you please
post follow-up patches within the original thread to make tracking
the discussion easier. It allows us to quickly see how this patch has evolved
from the original proposal.

/Bruce

> 
> v3 changes:
> - remove VERIFY macro
> - fix spelling error.
> - change unproper comment
> 
> v2 changes:
> - Replace all VERIFY macros instances by proper TEST_ASSERT* macros.
> - fix description
> 
> v1 changes:
> - first iteration of patch using VERIFY macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_sched.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_sched.c b/app/test/test_sched.c
> index c957d80..6a97e2c 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_sched.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_sched.c
> @@ -44,14 +44,7 @@
>  #include <rte_ip.h>
>  #include <rte_byteorder.h>
>  #include <rte_sched.h>
> -
> -
> -#define VERIFY(exp,fmt,args...)                    	                \
> -		if (!(exp)) {                                               \
> -			printf(fmt, ##args);                                    \
> -			return -1;                                              \
> -		}
> -
> +#include <rte_common.h>
>  
>  #define SUBPORT 	0
>  #define PIPE 		1
> @@ -92,6 +85,10 @@ static struct rte_sched_port_params port_param = {
>  	.n_pipe_profiles = 1,
>  };
>  
> +static struct rte_sched_port *port = NULL;
> +static struct rte_mbuf *in_mbufs[10];
> +static struct rte_mempool *mp = NULL;
> +
>  #define NB_MBUF          32
>  #define MAX_PACKET_SZ    2048
>  #define MBUF_SZ (MAX_PACKET_SZ + sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM)
> @@ -128,7 +125,6 @@ prepare_pkt(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
>  	struct ether_hdr *eth_hdr;
>  	struct vlan_hdr *vlan1, *vlan2;
>  	struct ipv4_hdr *ip_hdr;
> -
>  	/* Simulate a classifier */
>  	eth_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, struct ether_hdr *);
>  	vlan1 = (struct vlan_hdr *)(&eth_hdr->ether_type );
> @@ -150,64 +146,71 @@ prepare_pkt(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
>  }
>  
>  
> +static void
> +clean_environment(void)
> +{
> +	uint32_t i;
> +
> +	port = NULL;
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(in_mbufs); i++) {
> +		if (in_mbufs[i] != NULL) {
> +			rte_pktmbuf_free(in_mbufs[i]);
> +			in_mbufs[i] = NULL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * test main entrance for library sched
>   */
>  static int
>  test_sched(void)
>  {
> -	struct rte_mempool *mp = NULL;
> -	struct rte_sched_port *port = NULL;
>  	uint32_t pipe;
> -	struct rte_mbuf *in_mbufs[10];
> +	uint32_t i;
>  	struct rte_mbuf *out_mbufs[10];
> -	int i;
> -
>  	int err;
>  
> -	mp = create_mempool();
> -
>  	port_param.socket = 0;
>  	port_param.rate = (uint64_t) 10000 * 1000 * 1000 / 8;
>  
>  	port = rte_sched_port_config(&port_param);
> -	VERIFY(port != NULL, "Error config sched port\n");
> -
> +	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(port, "Error config sched port\n");
>  
>  	err = rte_sched_subport_config(port, SUBPORT, subport_param);
> -	VERIFY(err == 0, "Error config sched, err=%d\n", err);
> +	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(err, "Error config sched, err=%d\n", err);
>  
>  	for (pipe = 0; pipe < port_param.n_pipes_per_subport; pipe ++) {
>  		err = rte_sched_pipe_config(port, SUBPORT, pipe, 0);
> -		VERIFY(err == 0, "Error config sched pipe %u, err=%d\n", pipe, err);
> +		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(err, "Error config sched pipe %u, err=%d\n", pipe, err);
>  	}
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(in_mbufs); i++) {
>  		in_mbufs[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
> +		TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(in_mbufs[i], "Packet allocation failed\n");
>  		prepare_pkt(in_mbufs[i]);
>  	}
>  
> +	err = rte_sched_port_enqueue(port, in_mbufs, RTE_DIM(in_mbufs));
> +	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(err, RTE_DIM(in_mbufs), "Wrong enqueue, err=%d\n", err);
>  
> -	err = rte_sched_port_enqueue(port, in_mbufs, 10);
> -	VERIFY(err == 10, "Wrong enqueue, err=%d\n", err);
> -
> -	err = rte_sched_port_dequeue(port, out_mbufs, 10);
> -	VERIFY(err == 10, "Wrong dequeue, err=%d\n", err);
> +	err = rte_sched_port_dequeue(port, out_mbufs, RTE_DIM(out_mbufs));
> +	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(err, RTE_DIM(out_mbufs), "Wrong dequeue, err=%d\n", err);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(out_mbufs); i++) {
>  		enum rte_meter_color color;
>  		uint32_t subport, traffic_class, queue;
>  
>  		color = rte_sched_port_pkt_read_color(out_mbufs[i]);
> -		VERIFY(color == e_RTE_METER_YELLOW, "Wrong color\n");
> +		TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(color, e_RTE_METER_YELLOW, "Wrong color\n");
>  
>  		rte_sched_port_pkt_read_tree_path(out_mbufs[i],
>  				&subport, &pipe, &traffic_class, &queue);
>  
> -		VERIFY(subport == SUBPORT, "Wrong subport\n");
> -		VERIFY(pipe == PIPE, "Wrong pipe\n");
> -		VERIFY(traffic_class == TC, "Wrong traffic_class\n");
> -		VERIFY(queue == QUEUE, "Wrong queue\n");
> +		TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(subport, SUBPORT, "Wrong subport\n");
> +		TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(pipe, PIPE, "Wrong pipe\n");
> +		TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(traffic_class, TC, "Wrong traffic_class\n");
> +		TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(queue, QUEUE, "Wrong queue\n");
>  
>  	}
>  
> @@ -215,20 +218,63 @@ test_sched(void)
>  	struct rte_sched_subport_stats subport_stats;
>  	uint32_t tc_ov;
>  	rte_sched_subport_read_stats(port, SUBPORT, &subport_stats, &tc_ov);
> -	//VERIFY(subport_stats.n_pkts_tc[TC-1] == 10, "Wrong subport stats\n");
> -
> +#if 0
> +	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(subport_stats.n_pkts_tc[TC-1], 10, "Wrong subport stats\n");
> +#endif
>  	struct rte_sched_queue_stats queue_stats;
>  	uint16_t qlen;
>  	rte_sched_queue_read_stats(port, QUEUE, &queue_stats, &qlen);
> -	//VERIFY(queue_stats.n_pkts == 10, "Wrong queue stats\n");
> -
> +#if 0
> +	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(queue_stats.n_pkts, 10, "Wrong queue stats\n");
> +#endif
> +	/* Test cleanning */
>  	rte_sched_port_free(port);
> +	port = NULL;
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(in_mbufs); i++) {
> +			rte_pktmbuf_free(in_mbufs[i]);
> +			in_mbufs[i] = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +check_environment(void)
> +{
> +	uint32_t i;
> +
> +	TEST_ASSERT_NULL(port, "Port not cleaned by test\n");
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(in_mbufs); i++) {
> +		TEST_ASSERT_NULL(in_mbufs[i], "in_mbuff not cleaned by test\n");
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +
> +
> +static int
> +test_sched_start(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	mp = create_mempool();
> +	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(mp, "Error creating mempool\n");
> +
> +	if (check_environment() < 0)
> +		return -1;
> +	ret = test_sched();
> +	if (ret == 0)
> +		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(check_environment(), "Bad Values after test execution");
> +	else
> +		clean_environment();
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static struct test_command sched_cmd = {
>  	.command = "sched_autotest",
> -	.callback = test_sched,
> +	.callback = test_sched_start,
>  };
>  REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(sched_cmd);
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2015-02-10 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-30 11:14 Daniel Mrzyglod
2015-02-10 11:45 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150210114523.GA18684@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).