From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com [209.85.213.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C655A31 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 02:07:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id b16so40627054igk.1 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:07:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TbTFBLa0j/ZvFel8iwSz6waos/dhRPlXITxP449WJuY=; b=d5pPPNahyqPBGhl8M1f5bsn76ShynwMsuoelpVBT2Vtspeu1KmVQVJpXk3E2/p9yXD YmexV8jATV+Tt2ZD8sDgq73F3/U/LHD+qwHsfZXX3s2XmK4peuAaOBaF+90OdR5fEv1i Z6CZFItqyjdv0F16Bb01mTMxryGCsa5w9EMRPAPRvQyZVa/W0NlAd4qoqHAxCTM/vk/M lS3JooYXKUsoz5VQcOoyOfsmRqyJOOhkB4eJQ3Ruhk0AGNZboe8eeUqbiBqCu/U4wA/2 rV0/tf9rl5jDYgW9OkhySoeEydUfDtLQhSae/5GZesRNiz0AOzTkzShfCLW+6nys1euJ Ty0w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUFnqbtcx9GsBtIUVEmNzlhCDfSvUDAcQIBwSuHGirreXdQaNvS/r9R7Wu4qizRPsdhYgE X-Received: by 10.42.170.200 with SMTP id g8mr7069917icz.5.1424912835745; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:07:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from urahara (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n31sm26662390ioe.18.2015.02.25.17.07.15 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:07:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:07:18 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "Liang, Cunming" Message-ID: <20150225170718.371163a1@urahara> In-Reply-To: References: <20150224161609.15f590df@urahara> <20150224233651.5e27e791@urahara> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Nemeth, Balazs" , "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ixgbe vector mode not working. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 01:07:16 -0000 On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:49:48 +0000 "Liang, Cunming" wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Thanks for the info, with rxd=4000, I can reproduce it. > On that time, it runs out of mbuf. > I'll follow up this issue. The first time I ran it, the code was configure rx/tx conf which was leftover from older versions. Second time I ran it and the same hang happened. Looking at mbuf pool statistics I see that it gets exhausted, even when extra mbuf's are added to the pool. Looks like a memory leak.