From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E4211C5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  4 Mar 2015 15:10:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2015 06:10:36 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,687,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="535969801"
Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.243.20.24])
 by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 04 Mar 2015 06:10:29 -0800
Received: by  (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:10:32 +0025
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 14:10:32 +0000
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20150304141032.GD544@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <c826d83d78b0d24d0d840775b6ff6afaa848320c.1425449872.git.pmatilai@redhat.com>
 <1534932.rt5IAT3UZl@xps13> <54F6E6E3.50404@redhat.com>
 <20150304112805.GA5808@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
 <20150304130848.GA544@bricha3-MOBL3> <54F7077C.1010504@redhat.com>
 <20150304133129.GB544@bricha3-MOBL3> <54F70B9D.7040903@redhat.com>
 <20150304134911.GC544@bricha3-MOBL3>
 <CALwxeUtvB=sSgJfpNA6aqWO_W2sMobw1EQFwMTAk88vWrik25A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALwxeUtvB=sSgJfpNA6aqWO_W2sMobw1EQFwMTAk88vWrik25A@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: default to shared library
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:10:38 -0000

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:57:50PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com
> > wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:41:49PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > Right, but then there's "ivshmem" that doesn't fit that description
> > either
> > > AFAICS.
> >
> > Ah, yes, forgotten about that one! :-)
> 
> 
> Well, this is out of scope, but this config file should not exist in the
> first place.
> From my point of view, the ivshmem implementation is just badly hooked into
> the eal, and this is the only reason why ivshmem should have a build option
> (disabled) by default.
> 
> If we could cleanup this, then there would be no exception to the naming
> convention.
> 
No objections here! :-)

> 
> -- 
> David Marchand