From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/10] vmxnet3: support jumbo frames
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:35:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150310113559.4073f04f@urahara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D1237B72.39F61%yongwang@vmware.com>
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 23:32:48 +0000
Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com> wrote:
> >
> >I didn’t see where mtu is used to calculate how many rx descriptors will
> >be needed for each packet. Furthermore, as pointed out by the following
> >code comments, the device requires the first rx buffer of a packet be of
> >type VMXNET3_RXD_BTYPE_HEAD with the remaining buffers of type
> >VMXNET3_RXD_BTYPE_NODY. This needs to be taken care of when populating rx
> >rings in vmxnet3_post_rx_bufs(). Currently we don’t do this because no
> >scatter-rx is supported and only one descriptor is needed for a packet
> >(thus all types should be HEAD). Otherwise, the device will complain with
>
> To clarify, in this case only the 1st ring will be used and thus all types
> will be HEAD.
>
> >error returned. For the 2nd rx ring, type needs to be BODY for all
> >descriptors still.
Looking in more detail, the code as submitted looks fine:
* The # of rx descriptors needed for each packet is responsibility of
the application. Before and after this patch the # of Rx descriptors
for each ring (head/body) is determined by vmxnet3_rx_queue_setup.
And the driver always allocates the same number of descriptors
for both Rx rings.
One could argue that was a bug in the original driver, since it needlessly
allocated mbufs for the second ring and never used them. I suppose
as a optimization in future, the second ring could be sized as 0
and no buffers allocated unless doing rx-scatter (this is what the
Linux driver does. But that change is independent of this.
* Buffers are correctly reallocated as needed when consumed.
* The code works for bulk transfer and performance tests in jumbo mode.
I see no requirement to change this patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-06 0:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/10] vmxnet3: multisegment and bugfixes Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/10] vmxnet3: fix link state handling Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 17:21 ` Sanford, Robert
[not found] ` <0efb310c0ee54f9192eae95f6ee909e0@BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com>
2015-03-08 17:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/10] vmxnet3: enable VLAN filtering Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 21:54 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/10] vmxnet3: remove mtu check Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/10] vmxnet3: cleanup txq stats Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/10] vmxnet3: add support for multi-segment transmit Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/10] vmxnet3: support RSS and refactor offload Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/10] vmxnet3: support jumbo frames Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-09 23:28 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-09 23:32 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-10 18:35 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-03-11 1:03 ` Yong Wang
[not found] ` <4ebc1312d5cb42d583fb8a204c353feb@BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com>
2015-03-11 6:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
[not found] ` <9bc742bd1778468a815da8070b584ee7@BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com>
2015-03-10 4:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/10] vmxnet3: get rid of DEBUG ifdefs Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 21:59 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/10] vmxnet3: add check for jumbo segment Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 23:48 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/10] vmxnet3: remove excess inlining Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 23:54 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-07 2:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-10 13:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/10] vmxnet3: multisegment and bugfixes Thomas Monjalon
2015-06-22 12:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 23:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150310113559.4073f04f@urahara \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=shemming@brocade.com \
--cc=yongwang@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).