From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Stephen Hemminger <shemming@Brocade.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/10] vmxnet3: support jumbo frames
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:54:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150310235411.0ec554d2@urahara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ebc1312d5cb42d583fb8a204c353feb@BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com>
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 01:03:37 +0000
Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com> wrote:
> >Looking in more detail, the code as submitted looks fine:
> >
> >* The # of rx descriptors needed for each packet is responsibility of
> > the application. Before and after this patch the # of Rx descriptors
> > for each ring (head/body) is determined by vmxnet3_rx_queue_setup.
> > And the driver always allocates the same number of descriptors
> > for both Rx rings.
>
> Where is vmxnet3_rx_queue_setup? It’s not in the current code base nor in
> your patch and I failed to see how rx descriptors are populated.
> Could you explain what do you mean by responsibility of the application?
> If mtu is set to 9000, the driver needs to make sure rx buf per packet is
> set to the correct size with proper type set, right?
vmxnet3_dev_rx_queue_setup is unchanged from original Intel code.
But you are right there is a bug there since it will error out
if max_rx_pkt_len > bufsize. That error check should have been removed.
That was an oversight from the merge of our code with the DPDK/Intel
code. Just removing the check and surrounding code is all that is necessary.
After that driver will receive scattered mbufs.
None of the DPDK drivers do a good job of checking all the possible
misconfiguration of rxmode, jumbo and scattered flags. There is room
for improvement in all drivers around that.
> > One could argue that was a bug in the original driver, since it
> >needlessly
> > allocated mbufs for the second ring and never used them. I suppose
> > as a optimization in future, the second ring could be sized as 0
> > and no buffers allocated unless doing rx-scatter (this is what the
> > Linux driver does. But that change is independent of this.
>
> We can just keep it as is as we will need it if someone decides to support
> LRO for vmxnet3.
But LRO must be optional since LRO is broken for the case of forwarding.
Linux driver handles the case of only allocating second ring if necessary.
Although the Linux vmxnet3 driver was broken about LRO setting for
several years, it is fixed now.
> >
> >* Buffers are correctly reallocated as needed when consumed.
> >
> >* The code works for bulk transfer and performance tests in jumbo mode.
>
> You mean the standalone patch you posted without the
> vmxnet3_rx_queue_setup you mentioned?
The code in recv that calls vmxnet3_post_rx_bufs works for both rings
already. It was just until the scattered logic was engaged the second
ring was never used.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-11 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-06 0:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/10] vmxnet3: multisegment and bugfixes Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/10] vmxnet3: fix link state handling Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 17:21 ` Sanford, Robert
[not found] ` <0efb310c0ee54f9192eae95f6ee909e0@BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com>
2015-03-08 17:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/10] vmxnet3: enable VLAN filtering Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 21:54 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/10] vmxnet3: remove mtu check Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/10] vmxnet3: cleanup txq stats Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/10] vmxnet3: add support for multi-segment transmit Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/10] vmxnet3: support RSS and refactor offload Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/10] vmxnet3: support jumbo frames Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-09 23:28 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-09 23:32 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-10 18:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-11 1:03 ` Yong Wang
[not found] ` <4ebc1312d5cb42d583fb8a204c353feb@BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com>
2015-03-11 6:54 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
[not found] ` <9bc742bd1778468a815da8070b584ee7@BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com>
2015-03-10 4:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/10] vmxnet3: get rid of DEBUG ifdefs Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 21:59 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/10] vmxnet3: add check for jumbo segment Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 23:48 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-06 0:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/10] vmxnet3: remove excess inlining Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-06 23:54 ` Yong Wang
2015-03-07 2:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-10 13:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/10] vmxnet3: multisegment and bugfixes Thomas Monjalon
2015-06-22 12:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 23:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150310235411.0ec554d2@urahara \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=shemming@Brocade.com \
--cc=yongwang@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).