From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF4E5690
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:45:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hmsreliant.think-freely.org
 ([2001:470:8:a08:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] helo=localhost)
 by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63)
 (envelope-from <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>)
 id 1YXXDG-0007O1-Lm; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:45:56 -0400
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:45:53 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20150316154553.GD16238@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
References: <1426510564-19164-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com>
 <20150316131916.GC16238@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
 <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2ED005D@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2ED005D@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Status: No
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix Wbad-function-cast warning
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:45:58 -0000

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:04:45PM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:19 PM
> > To: Mcnamara, John
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix Wbad-function-cast warning
> > 
> > 
> > This looks reasonable, but it rather begs the question as to why we need
> > rte_align_floor_int in the first place.  Theres only one other call site,
> > and it looks like it could use RTE_PTR_ALIGN_FLOOR just as easily.  What
> > about fixing up the second call site and removing the function to save
> > some space?
> 
> Hi Neil,
> 
> Seems like a good idea. I'll submit a v2.
> 
> Does rte_align_floor_int() need to be deprecated in some way or is it okay to just remove it?
> 
> John
> 
After the 2.0 release you should put a note in the api document, yes, but right
now its not required.  Though if you wanted to, I wouldn't stop you :)
Neil