From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329435677
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 16:03:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2015 08:03:56 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,465,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="472461751"
Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.243.20.28])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2015 08:03:53 -0700
Received: by  (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:03:53 +0025
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:03:52 +0000
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Shankari Vaidyalingam <shankari.v2k6@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150325150352.GB5620@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <CAGeyXNdnHe_DB0Azr56Pj-KMTFzTCpy4YWHDLPPHsaDQ19efJg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGeyXNdnHe_DB0Azr56Pj-KMTFzTCpy4YWHDLPPHsaDQ19efJg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Interface name after bound to IGB
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:03:58 -0000

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 08:00:02PM +0530, Shankari Vaidyalingam wrote:
> Hi
> 
> By what name is the NIC port identified after it is bound to the igb_uio
> driver (i.e after it becomes a DPDK interface)
> I'm asking this question because the interface does not get displayed in
> the output of the "ifconfig" after it gets bound to igb_uio driver.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Shankari.V

Identified where, or to what? It still maintains the same PCI bus-device-function
which can be used to identify it, if that is what you mean.

/Bruce