From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8501720F for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:41:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by padcy3 with SMTP id cy3so59787436pad.3 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:41:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8hoJRji2EgACXEgYl4m4uTJx7tw1AS4UTtZoreAGNb4=; b=CcqGpivha1QHftvBZCr3THgGLVlWTvpfTzuLuRfQ36V2SUufSB0+SP8bMmGpb9lOwe 0oXfKjZzsHbLLOV3dS8vwlZygHOFxb3JgsgKM0uIMotZui02DDgKqrds3bA8Y4Gy5gTR l0eq0zBmdBFsqRb9De5EXKDF/OvCj2SPkZfY5W0OQf9+dckIlziRBH6T9+LPGvhuI/kU wkj0e/sN5A57UYDxzXBu+uzSn0oPkxiORp3HxLu7xpiQLflMugoH8WhN/wqE9KPN+z7M BLV/GXBFU8D5REG8uuIeQeaGcQWnUubgcujmJg6hNMpSRMWgInIzcCjdXes49QtpdKMY OALA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl0sr+GhmMRuXURa1q2C4OYCiWWWMBbzHXRyqDBPBGxdx5AQDu7lep51et8SxfkgU07hf47 X-Received: by 10.70.103.144 with SMTP id fw16mr26586965pdb.149.1427913713768; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urahara (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id iw1sm2838430pbd.8.2015.04.01.11.41.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:41:59 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Karmarkar Suyash Message-ID: <20150401114159.5aabb5fb@urahara> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Running DPDK with Docker X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:41:54 -0000 On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:56:56 +0000 Karmarkar Suyash wrote: > Hi, > > Given the popularity of Docker it would be nice if we can run DPDK inside a Docker container but the challenge is the igb_uio.ko and rte_kni.ko kernel modules which need to be compiled with the exact kernel source running on the host. Are there ways to seamlessly run DPDK with Docker? I came across an articles about running DPDK with Linux container but still the requirement is to insert igb_uio. Any plans to make the igb_uio and rte_kni modules as default modules of Linux source code or any other better approaches/suggestions ? Thanks. > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-October/006373.html > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/6479 igb_uio and rte_kni are unlikely to be accepted upstream since they have intrinsic security problems. Can you use VFIO?