From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com (mail-pd0-f181.google.com
 [209.85.192.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1873CFE5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  9 Apr 2015 00:37:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pdbnk13 with SMTP id nk13so130361054pdb.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 15:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=aDzQa3FqErXLlXiYt+Yg+uo4z7fxP0xQQJf8dUtgTkU=;
 b=XpHLmCYoZBzYRv6pRmcVY6lixQ5j4fKrdRsRG1ek1R721X1U1FcmkPG/+S+ZfT172q
 Q51POfQd6NzUYW5TDOYnMVHnLR7NXRWNxmY9MFy5GWFlsUo1/skDbCKU7IKrWKz6ZC/P
 HQ2S67/bBXnn/Ryx0XD6im5TkaJUmt86wikF7oA/c9mOtspW58NhMHgVtu3Zt8eZdbUv
 tWK9dwg8BP+rrhc95ltOHH+7S6B28rU9AvvOji2P2V3WsOECSygd3XWs2uAbr1c1t14Q
 7NK7T7C4kv2J+uBlvDCzy6YK0xr2Q9vm8SzDKQhVxzYNfFXaJCdYSoiTWMzsG9FJkugB
 AbOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmVE5hX8iw75DPLr5P+UsGZ3sa/xlIiMffZ6QcAvZUMTKpdaUb6NwaQ0DS6jbYCgBh5IuPQ
X-Received: by 10.66.123.110 with SMTP id lz14mr51241383pab.30.1428532677409; 
 Wed, 08 Apr 2015 15:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from urahara (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net.
 [50.53.82.155])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c8sm12331794pdj.65.2015.04.08.15.37.56
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 08 Apr 2015 15:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 15:38:02 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Jay Rolette <rolette@infiniteio.com>
Message-ID: <20150408153802.2bc59227@urahara>
In-Reply-To: <0FBA33A7-A21E-426F-B44E-32E86F2B23DB@infiniteio.com>
References: <3571725.20GtF5MAnU@xps13>
 <0C5AFCA4B3408848ADF2A3073F7D8CC86D58F9C2@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20150408114339.GA22959@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
 <0C5AFCA4B3408848ADF2A3073F7D8CC86D58FB64@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20150408131105.GD22959@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
 <0C5AFCA4B3408848ADF2A3073F7D8CC86D58FDBF@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <0FBA33A7-A21E-426F-B44E-32E86F2B23DB@infiniteio.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] tools brainstorming
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 22:37:58 -0000

On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:29:54 -0600
Jay Rolette <rolette@infiniteio.com> wrote:

> "C comments" includes //, right? It's been part of the C standard for a long time now...

Yes but.
I like to use checkpatch and checkpatch enforces kernel style which does not allow // for
comments.