DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] NO_AUTOLIB is this variable really needed?
@ 2015-04-30 14:55 Wiles, Keith
  2015-04-30 16:24 ` Bruce Richardson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wiles, Keith @ 2015-04-30 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

What is the NO_AUTOLIB variable used for anyway, the doc states this:


* NO_AUTOLIBS: If set, the libraries provided by the framework will not be
included in the LDLIBS variable automatically.

Why was this variable created, do we have really good reason? It seems
like the variable removes almost all of the standard libs.


Regards,
++Keith

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-01  9:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-30 14:55 [dpdk-dev] NO_AUTOLIB is this variable really needed? Wiles, Keith
2015-04-30 16:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-04-30 16:26   ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-01  9:10     ` Bruce Richardson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).