From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Received: from filtteri6.pp.htv.fi (filtteri6.pp.htv.fi [213.243.153.189])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABB9CC6E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  1 May 2015 21:59:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by filtteri6.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE25856F439;
 Fri,  1 May 2015 22:59:37 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from smtp5.welho.com ([213.243.153.39])
 by localhost (filtteri6.pp.htv.fi [213.243.153.189]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id rKO-C9lps+Gw; Fri,  1 May 2015 22:59:33 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from fuloong-minipc (91-145-91-118.bb.dnainternet.fi [91.145.91.118])
 by smtp5.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC865BC007;
 Fri,  1 May 2015 22:59:33 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 22:59:32 +0300
From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
To: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Message-ID: <20150501195932.GD595@fuloong-minipc.musicnaut.iki.fi>
References: <D1690998.1E825%keith.wiles@intel.com>
 <20150501110914.182dcfb1@urahara>
 <20150501194951.GA25199@mhcomputing.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150501194951.GA25199@mhcomputing.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 19:59:38 -0000

On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:49:51PM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 11:09:14AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > With email, the patches are right in front of developers and easier to quote
> > for review comments.
> 
> Right in front of that subset of developers who do everything kernel-style, 
> perhaps yes. But this sort of workflow is in the minority these days, pretty 
> much every other project I've worked on besides the kernel used graphical 
> merging tools for this to make things easier to follow for the uninitiated.

Projects like GCC, GLIBC, binutils, busybox, etc or what?

A.