DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Assaad, Sami \(Sami\)" <sami.assaad@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] How do you setup a VM in Promiscuous Mode using PCI Pass-Through (SR-IOV)?
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:27:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150515092719.GA1520@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150514164719.7b68b0ef@urahara>

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 04:47:19PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2015 21:38:24 +0000
> "Assaad, Sami (Sami)" <sami.assaad@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > My Hardware consists of the following:
> >   - DL380 Gen 9 Server supporting two Haswell Processors (Xeon CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz)
> >   - An x540 Ethernet Controller Card supporting 2x10G ports.
> > 
> > Software:
> >   - CentOS 7 (3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64)
> >   - DPDK 1.8
> > 
> > I want all the network traffic received on the two 10G ports to be transmitted to my VM. The issue is that the Virtual Function / Physical Functions have setup the internal virtual switch to only route Ethernet packets with destination MAC address matching the VM virtual interface MAC. How can I configure my virtual environment to provide all network traffic to the VM...i.e. set the virtual functions for both PCI devices in Promiscuous mode?
> > 
> > [ If a l2fwd-vf example exists, this would actually solve this problem ... Is there a DPDK l2fwd-vf example available? ]
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Sami Assaad.
> 
> This is a host side (not DPDK) issue.
> 
> Intel PF driver will not allow guest (VF) to go into promiscious mode
> since it would allow traffic stealing which is a security violation.

Could you maybe try passing the PF directly into the VM, rather than a VF based
off it? Since you seem to want all traffic to go to the one VM, there seems little
point in creating a VF on the device, and should let the VM control the whole
NIC directly.

Regards,
/Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-15  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-14 21:38 Assaad, Sami (Sami)
2015-05-14 23:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-15  9:27   ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2015-05-15  9:31     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-05-15 12:59       ` Assaad, Sami (Sami)
2015-05-15 13:56         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-05-15 12:54     ` Assaad, Sami (Sami)
2015-05-15 13:08       ` Bruce Richardson
2015-05-15 19:30         ` Assaad, Sami (Sami)
2015-05-18 10:01           ` Qiu, Michael
2015-05-19 19:23             ` Assaad, Sami (Sami)
2015-05-20  9:14               ` Qiu, Michael
2015-05-20  9:19               ` Qiu, Michael
2015-05-20 10:56               ` Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150515092719.GA1520@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=sami.assaad@alcatel-lucent.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).