DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] ixgbe: silence noisy log messages
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:39:56 -0700
Message-ID: <20150518093956.0e5411d3@urahara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150518093201.GD1636@bricha3-MOBL3>

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:32:01 +0100
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> For the most part, this looks fine. However, I'm unsure about changing the log
> level of the messages stating what the RX and TX burst functions in use are. I
> would view this as important information that should generally be displayed as
> the performance impacts of using a sub-optimal RX/TX code path are large.
> /Bruce

At INFO level it shows up in log files that customers read.
This is an issue where DPDK has to grow up and be ready for real world
use, rather than being developer friendly.

Our customers ask about every log message (believe me). So if there
is no problem the drivers must be absolutely silent (STFU)

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-18 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-15 17:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] ixgbe: logging patches Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-15 17:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] ixgbe: remove unnecessary casts Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-18  9:24   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-05-15 17:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] ixgbe: don't print PCI address on link change Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-18  9:32   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-05-15 17:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] ixgbe: raise priority of significant events Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-18  9:27   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-05-15 17:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] ixgbe: use RTE_LOG not rte_log Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-18  9:28   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-05-15 17:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] ixgbe: silence noisy log messages Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-18  9:32   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-05-18 16:39     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-05-19  7:46       ` David Marchand
2015-05-19 14:40         ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150518093956.0e5411d3@urahara \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git