From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] pipeline: add statistics for librte_pipeline ports and tables
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:59:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150520105946.4ac86349@uryu.home.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2017641.P0ts6fjbPO@xps13>
On Wed, 20 May 2015 16:44:35 +0200
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
> Please Cristian, do not top post.
> I'm replacing your comment in the right context.
>
> 2015-05-20 13:57, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > > Thanks for the detailed explanation.
> > >
> > > You are raising a trade-off problem about
> > > feature/maintenance/performance.
> > > I think we must choose among 4 solutions:
> > > 1/ always enabled
> > > 2/ build-time log level
> > > 3/ run-time option
> > > 4/ build-time option
> > >
> > > It's good to have this discussion and let other contributors giving their
> > > opinion.
> > >
> > > 2015-05-19 22:41, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > > > 1. What is the technical solution to avoid performance loss due to stats
> > > > support?
> > > > Generally, I would agree with you that config options should be avoided,
> > > > especially those that alter the API (function prototypes, data structure
> > > > layouts, etc). Please note this is not the case for any of our patches,
> > > > as only the stats collection is enabled/disabled, while the data
> > > > structures and functions are not changed by the build time option.
> > > >
> > > > But what can you do for statistics? We all know that collecting the stats
> > > > sucks up CPU cycles, especially due to memory accesses, so stats always
> > > > have a run-time cost. Traditionally, stats are typically enabled for
> > > > debugging purposes and then turned off for the release version when
> > > > performance is required. How can this be done if build time flags are not
> > > > used?
> > >
> > > Statistics in drivers are always enabled (first solution).
> > > If those statistics are only used for debugging, why not using the build-time
> > > option CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL? (second solution)
> >
> > Can you please describe what solution 2 on your list (build-time log
> > level) consists of?
> >
> > I see log level useful for printing messages when an event takes place,
> > but this is not what these stats patches are about. We want to poll
> > for those counters on demand: if the build-time flag is off, then the
> > value of those counters is 0; when the build-time is on, then the stats
> > counters have the real value. Basically, the build-time flag only
> > enables/disables the update of the counters at run-time, which is where
> > CPU cycles are consumed. I am not sure how the log levels can help here?
>
> I think that counting stats is a kind of logging.
> Some stats are always counted (see drivers) and you want to use these ones
> only for debugging (after rebuilding DPDK with some debug options).
> So I suggest, as second solution, to check CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL is at debug
> level instead of having one option per module.
> It would be implemented with "#if RTE_LOG_LEVEL == RTE_LOG_DEBUG" in
> RTE_PIPELINE_STATS_ADD.
>
In my experience, per-queue or per-cpu statistics have no visible performance
impact. And every real world deployment wants statistics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 12:15 Michal Jastrzebski
2015-05-05 15:11 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-18 11:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-19 22:41 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-20 0:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-20 13:57 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-20 14:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-20 17:59 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-05-20 22:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-20 23:56 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-20 23:41 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-21 7:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-21 13:33 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-21 14:59 ` Jay Rolette
2015-05-21 16:15 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-25 10:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150520105946.4ac86349@uryu.home.lan \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).