From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BEE3C384 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 17:05:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2015 08:05:54 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,553,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="705333228" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.220.135]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 04 Jun 2015 08:05:52 -0700 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 04 Jun 2015 16:05:51 +0025 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:05:51 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20150604150551.GA10280@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1433359137-12720-1-git-send-email-rolette@infiniteio.com> <20150604133916.GB10532@bricha3-MOBL3> <20150604134056.GC10532@bricha3-MOBL3> <1991422.2bqYBlViPU@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1991422.2bqYBlViPU@xps13> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kni: minor opto X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 15:05:55 -0000 On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:02:06PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-06-04 14:40, Bruce Richardson: > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 02:39:17PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:18:55PM -0500, Jay Rolette wrote: > > > > Don't need the 'safe' version of list_for_each_entry() if you aren't deleting from the list as you iterate over it > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jay Rolette > > > > > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson > > > > > Forgot to mention though, that the commit title needs to be a little more > > descriptive. > > So you should not ack this version ;) > Code and text description looked fine, so I thought an ack otherwise appropriate. However, I will refrain from doing so in future :-) /Bruce