From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net>
Received: from ernst.netinsight.se (ernst.netinsight.se [194.16.221.21])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 426D95ABA
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:45:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from miho (unverified [10.100.1.152]) by ernst.netinsight.se
 (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id <B0030164860@ernst.netinsight.se>;
 Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:45:53 +0200
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:45:53 +0200
From: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20150611104553.1207678f@miho>
In-Reply-To: <2892912.hbmKnaj783@xps13>
References: <2520130.3p9lvqUWmZ@xps13> <20150611092702.06cc9405@miho>
 <2892912.hbmKnaj783@xps13>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] deadline notice
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:45:59 -0000

On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:33:21 +0200
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:

> 2015-06-11 09:27, Simon Kagstrom:
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:39:59 +0200
> > Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
> > 
> > I didn't find this in the list:
> > 
> >   rte_reorder: Allow sequence numbers > 0 as starting point
> 
> It was considered more or less as a fix.
> 
> > and I think it would be good to have as well.
> 
> Yes of course.

OK, thanks!

It would be good to have some sort of feedback on accepted patches
though - in addition to the above one, I also sent a build-fix

  kni: Use utsrelease.h to determine Ubuntu kernel version

which I also think would be good to have (basically, building in a
chroot is broken otherwise). I haven't had time to test the patch on
older Ubuntus though.


So, while this is an old discussion by now, I think DPDK is large
enough to warrant some more infrastructure for patch submissions - at
least in the form of build-tests for patches, and preferrably some sort
of status marker for accepted patches. Basically what Github/Travis-ci
etc already provides.

// Simon